Enquire Now
Please provide your details to reserve space at Guardian Vaults.
Enquire Now
Please provide your details to reserve space at Guardian Vaults.
Enquire Now
Please provide your details to reserve space at Guardian Vaults.
Enquire Now
Please provide your details to reserve space at Guardian Vaults.
Enquire Now
Please provide your details to reserve space at Guardian Vaults.
Advocates of the Save our Swiss Gold campaign were left disappointed on Sunday (November 30), as the referendum returned a ‘no’ verdict.
Over three-quarters (77 per cent) of voters rejected plans that would have resulted in Switzerland moving to a de-facto gold standard.
Under a ‘yes’ result, the Swiss government would need to retain at least 20 per cent of its balance sheet in gold bullion, as well as repatriating any reserves currently held abroad.
This could have had a number of ramifications on the country’s economy and international gold markets.
In order to pass, the referendum needed to secure a 50 per cent ‘yes’ vote. However, every canton in the country returned a majority ‘no’ outcome.
The vote was held alongside two other referendums on the same day, with the Swiss also asked to decide on immigration caps and current tax laws.
‘No’ votes were also returned in these referendums. The first poll would have limited immigration numbers to 0.2 per cent of the population, while the other aimed to end tax breaks on income and wealth charges for wealthy foreigners.
Commenting on the Save our Swiss Gold initiative, one industry commentator claimed proponents failed to put enough thought into the campaign.
Writing for Forbes, Steve Forbes said the restrictions suggested failed to make economic sense even for those who support a return to the gold standard. For example, the country would have been prevented from selling any of its gold reserves, a policy he described as “ludicrous”.
“Under all gold standards, including the legendary classical gold standard that was in place from the end of the Napoleonic wars until the outbreak of World War I, countries routinely have bought and sold gold,” he explained.
“In fact, you can’t have a genuine gold standard with such a prohibition.”
Monthly Updates
From Guardian Vaults
‘No’ Vote Prevails in Swiss Referendum
Advocates of the Save our Swiss Gold campaign were left disappointed on Sunday (November 30), as the referendum returned a ‘no’ verdict.
Over three-quarters (77 per cent) of voters rejected plans that would have resulted in Switzerland moving to a de-facto gold standard.
Under a ‘yes’ result, the Swiss government would need to retain at least 20 per cent of its balance sheet in gold bullion, as well as repatriating any reserves currently held abroad.
This could have had a number of ramifications on the country’s economy and international gold markets.
In order to pass, the referendum needed to secure a 50 per cent ‘yes’ vote. However, every canton in the country returned a majority ‘no’ outcome.
The vote was held alongside two other referendums on the same day, with the Swiss also asked to decide on immigration caps and current tax laws.
‘No’ votes were also returned in these referendums. The first poll would have limited immigration numbers to 0.2 per cent of the population, while the other aimed to end tax breaks on income and wealth charges for wealthy foreigners.
Commenting on the Save our Swiss Gold initiative, one industry commentator claimed proponents failed to put enough thought into the campaign.
Writing for Forbes, Steve Forbes said the restrictions suggested failed to make economic sense even for those who support a return to the gold standard. For example, the country would have been prevented from selling any of its gold reserves, a policy he described as “ludicrous”.
“Under all gold standards, including the legendary classical gold standard that was in place from the end of the Napoleonic wars until the outbreak of World War I, countries routinely have bought and sold gold,” he explained.
“In fact, you can’t have a genuine gold standard with such a prohibition.”
Disclaimers: Guardian Vaults Holdings Pty Ltd, Registered Office, Scottish House, 100 William Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000. ACN 138618176 (“Guardian Vaults”) All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from the publisher and/or the author. Information contained herein is believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. It is not designed to meet your personal situation. Guardian Vaults, its officers, agents, representatives and employees do not hold an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL), are not an authorised representative of an AFSL and otherwise are not qualified to provide you with advice of any kind in relation to financial products. If you require advice about a financial product, you should contact a properly licensed or authorised financial advisor. The information is indicative and general in nature only and is prepared for information purposes only and does not purport to contain all matters relevant to any particular investment. Subject to any terms implied by law and which cannot be excluded, Guardian Vaults, shall not be liable for any errors, omissions, defects or misrepresentations (including by reasons of negligence, negligent misstatement or otherwise) or for any loss or damage (direct or indirect) suffered by persons who use or rely on such information. The opinions expressed herein are those of the publisher and/or the author and may not be representative of the opinions of Guardian Vaults, its officers, agents, representatives and employees. Such information does not take into account the particular circumstances, investment objectives and needs for investment of any person, or purport to be comprehensive or constitute investment or financial product advice and should not be relied upon as such. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or laws the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. You should seek professional advice before you decide to invest or consider any action based on the information provided. If you do not agree with any of the above disclaimers, you should immediately cease viewing or making use of any of the information provided.